Cases 21 - 30 of 36
SCHNEIBLE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50731
Plaintiff:
SETH SCHNEIBLE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 7457
STEINER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44134
Plaintiff:
SETH J. STEINER, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WHITE et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35457
Plaintiff:
SETH ISRAEL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RIDOUT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv38918
Plaintiff:
SETH RIDOUT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
THOMAS et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63654
Plaintiff:
SETH CHARLES THOMAS and FAY PIPKIN THOMAS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINGFIELD et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60501
Plaintiff:
SETH LYNN WINGFIELD and HELEN F. WINGFIELD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBBINS v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2010cv07080
Plaintiff:
SETH ROBBINS
Defendant:
STEFAN ROBERTS and SWIFT TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STRAFF et al v. SMITH ABRASIVES, INC.
as 2:2010cv03394
Plaintiff:
SETH STRAFF and RUTH STRAFF
Defendant:
SMITH ABRASIVES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCARTY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71818
Plaintiff:
SETH L. MCCARTY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMILEY v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv01671
Plaintiff:
SETH S. SMILEY
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
