Cases 31 - 40 of 30,665
Smith v. Butler et al.
as 3:2024cv00905
Defendant:
Brandy Sheldon Butler, Sheldon Brandy Butler, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa C. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02770
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02815
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Leon Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Montez et al
as 3:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Larry Smith
Defendant:
Chadrick Autry Montez and SAIA Motor Freight Line, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Smith v. Avlon Industries et al
as 1:2024cv04192
Plaintiff:
Joann D Smith
Defendant:
Avlon Industries, Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02698
Plaintiff:
Amelia Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Amber Smith
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02592
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hopkins et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02524
Plaintiff:
Henry Hopkins and Ebony Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Imperium Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Loyd Smith
Defendant:
Imperium Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
