Cases 31 - 40 of 341
Battle v. The Kroger Co
as 3:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Battle
Defendant:
The Kroger Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Battle v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv20828
Plaintiff:
Audrey M. Battle
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Battle v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv17500
Plaintiff:
George Battle
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BATTLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04847
Plaintiff:
JAMES BATTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Battle v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv15926
Plaintiff:
Allen Battle
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
Battle v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Battle
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BATTLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02944
Plaintiff:
JEREMY TERREL BATTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BATTLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
LISA BATTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BATTLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22487
Plaintiff:
FANNETA A BATTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BATTLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20355
Plaintiff:
KHALIM BATTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
