Cases 31 - 40 of 310
Rone et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04482
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bowman Rone and Christopher Rone
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murillo et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv03847
Plaintiff:
Martha Murillo , Kathleen Bates , Jamie Anzaldua and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv03709
Plaintiff:
Theresa Drake and Christopher Drake
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeRussy et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03667
Plaintiff:
Patricia DeRussy and Christopher DeRussy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02970
Plaintiff:
Brooke Parker and Christopher Parker
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02904
Plaintiff:
Judith James and Christopher James
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boehk et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02387
Plaintiff:
Melissa Boehk and Christopher Boehk
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
St. Cyr et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02128
Plaintiff:
Connie St. Cyr and Christopher St. Cyr
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) et al
as 3:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carl Thurston Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), Federal Bureau of Investigation, Berkeley County WV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satterfield et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01539
Plaintiff:
Candace Satterfield and Christopher Satterfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
