Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Hunter et al v. Dexcom, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00853
Plaintiff:
Gordon Hunter and Julia Bell Hunter
Defendant:
Dexcom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hunter et al v. Dexcom, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00847
Plaintiff:
Gordon Hunter and Julia Bell Hunter
Defendant:
Dexcom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GORDON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2013cv00832
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS GORDON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DR. THOMAS PARKER VAIL, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Messick et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 5:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Linda Messick and Gordon Messick
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniels v. Mason
as 4:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Harold Gordon Daniels
Defendant:
Phillip Mason
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MASSEY et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP
as 1:2008cv00435
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATAION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and GLAXOSMITHKLINE USA
Plaintiff:
MARY L MASSEY and ERA M GORDON
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beecham et al
as 3:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Beecham, Alice Faye Ford, Revell Scott and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gregory et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00291
Plaintiff:
Gordon Eugene Gregory and Myrna J. Gregory
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Murphy et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Wayne Gordon Murphy and Katie Jones Murphy
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg Warner Corporation, CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
A. W. Chesterton Company
Cross Defendant:
Fluor Daniel Services Corporation, General Refractories Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
