Cases 31 - 37 of 37
High v. ARAMARK Corporation
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Reba Ruth Hill High
Defendant:
ARAMARK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00809
Plaintiff:
ALLEN HILL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. , DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DR. THOMAS PARKER VAIL, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill et al v. SSC Statesville Maple Leaf Operating Company LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
David Hill and Tonya Hill
Defendant:
SSC Statesville Maple Leaf Operating Company LLC , SavaSeniorCare Administrative Services, LLC and SSC Equity Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Titan America LLC, et al v. Darrell, et al
as 7:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Titan America LLC and Carolinas Cement Company LLC
Defendant:
Kayne O. Darrell and David L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YARBOROUGH v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.
as 1:2008cv00547
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HILL YARBOROUGH, JR., CHARLES HILL YARBOROUGH, JR., CHARLES HILL YARBOROUGH, JR. and others
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00131
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Hill
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
A. W. Chesterton Company and Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
General Refractories Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation, National Service Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hill et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill and Diana B. Hill
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
A. W. Chesterton Company
Cross Defendant:
Fluor Daniel Services Corporation, General Refractories Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
