Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Osborn et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv25407
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ryan Osborn and Jim Osborn
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Haymart et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21296
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Haymart and Jess Haymart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sawyer et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv20847
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Sawyer and Jesse O. Sawyer
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv18525
Plaintiff:
Faitha Bryan and Jesse Bryan
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C&R Downhole Drilling, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson
Defendant:
C&R Downhole Drilling, Inc. and Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
Cross_claimant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC
Cross_defendant:
C&R Downhole Drilling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gates et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv15784
Plaintiff:
Marylin Gates and Jess Odell Gates
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14533
Plaintiff:
Laurie Dee Hawkins and Jesse D. Hawkins
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bilbrey et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12426
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bilbrey and Jesse Bilbrey
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Childers et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09581
Plaintiff:
Anita Childers and Jesse Childers
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06924
Plaintiff:
Paula Morgan and Jesse James Morgan
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
