Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Tooley v. CPI Plastics Group, Ltd.
as 5:2008cv04088
Plaintiff:
Amy Tooley
Defendant:
CPI Plastics Group, Ltd. and CPI Plastics Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Andrew v. Iowa Interstate Railroad Ltd.
as 3:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew and Robert Andrew
Defendant:
Iowa Interstate Railroad Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gaskell v. Maharishi Vedic Education Development Corporation et al
as 4:2008cv00084
Plaintiff:
Frances Gaskell
Defendant:
Maharishi Vedic Education Development Corporation, Maharishi Ayurveda Foundation, Maharishi Ayurveda Arogyadham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bakken v. Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd et al
as 3:2007cv03039
Plaintiff:
Sidney Bakken
Defendant:
Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc, Spinalgraft Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. Kennedy Mall LTD LLC et al
as 2:2007cv01011
Plaintiff:
Ilah Williams
Defendant:
Kennedy Mall LTD LLC, Cafaro Company and D & R Stores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smock v. Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd et al
as 1:2007cv00051
Plaintiff:
Michael Smock
Defendant:
Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd and New Horizon FS, Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Armstrong et al v. Hitachi America, Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Armstrong, Kathy Armstrong, Rick Cain and others
Defendant:
Hitachi America, Ltd., Babcock & Wilcox Company and Chemco Systems, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Howard v. Spinalgraft Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2007cv03021
Plaintiff:
Dana Howard and Dana Howard
Defendant:
Spinalgraft Technologies, LLC, Regeneration Technologies, Inc, Michael Mastromarino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
