Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Myers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Brian Myers
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Woods v. Wolosko et al
as 3:2009cv00839
Plaintiff:
Maurice Woods, Maurice Woods, Maurice Woods and others
Defendant:
Charles Michael Wolosko, David Starkey, Myers International Midways, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Duncan v. Lowe's Home Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01062
Plaintiff:
Michael Duncan
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Center, Inc., John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Miscellaneou:
Rondall Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ralston v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01241
Plaintiff:
Sheri Ralston
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Rondall Myers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hagen v. U-Haul Co. of Tennessee et al
as 1:2008cv01197
Plaintiff:
Robert Hagen and Dale Hagen
Defendant:
U-Haul Co. of Tennessee, Keith O'Brien, Ronald Mathison and others
Miscellaneou:
Rondall Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Evans v. Arise Incorporated et al
as 1:2008cv01177
Plaintiff:
Leslie Evans, III
Defendant:
Arise Incorporated, ITT Corporation, McDonald & Miller and others
Miscellaneou:
Ronald Myers
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sanders et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01061
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sanders and Bobby Sanders
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. and Lowe's of Paris, Tennessee #1789
Miscellaneou:
Rondall Myers
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Myers v. Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv00283
Plaintiff:
Lena Margaret Myers
Defendant:
Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd., Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
