Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Bloxam v. Low Cost Interlock, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00391
Defendant:
Commissioner, State of Connecticut and Low Cost Interlock, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Curtis Bloxam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA et al v. Behavioral Management, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut and USA
Defendant:
Behavioral Management, LLC and Neil Quatrano
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Anderson v. Russell et al
as 3:2020cv01777
Defendant:
Postmaster General, US, JEANETTE RUSSELL, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
SHATARA ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
USA et al v. Okwuosa et al
as 3:2020cv01414
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut and USA
Defendant:
Hector B. Chukweumeka Okwuosa and My Father My Son Rehabilitation and Counseling Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Volkmar et al v. Leach et al
as 3:2020cv01168
Plaintiff:
Peter T Volkmar and Daphne L Volkmar
Defendant:
Thomas Leach, PV Holding Corp. doing business as Avis Budget Group Inc and United States Of America
Washington v. USA
as 3:2020cv01114
Plaintiff:
Katy Barnett Washington
Defendant:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Eastwood v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2020cv00671
Defendant:
Roberta C Nieves and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Megan L Eastwood
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
USA et al v. Your Eyes of New Britain, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00430
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut and USA
Defendant:
Your Eyes of New Britain, Inc. and Carol Sanderson
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Rodriguez-Deets v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2020cv00189
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Rodriguez-Deets
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
USA et al v. Children's Behavioral Therapy et al
as 3:2020cv00110
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut and USA
Defendant:
Channa Sontag and Children's Behavioral Therapy
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
