Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Pierce v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08196
Plaintiff:
Karen Denise Pierce
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07687
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lynn Gist Pierce
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07514
Plaintiff:
Ruth Pierce and John A. Pierce
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv03379
Plaintiff:
Lela Pierce
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02709
Plaintiff:
Vicki Pierce and James Earl Pierce
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33801
Plaintiff:
Mary Pierce and Robert Vandehey
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32684
Plaintiff:
Patsy Pierce
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32717
Plaintiff:
Sharyn Louise Pierce
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv32376
Plaintiff:
Janice Pierson , Janet Plasse , Karen Coleman and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicholson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31707
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, Holdings Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Nicholson , Tracey Nitcholas , Lois Amick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
