Cases 41 - 50 of 401
Johnson v. CSAA Insurance Services, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00099
Defendant:
Salih Williams, Dawanna Adams and CSAA Insurance Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sexton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00282
Plaintiff:
Chastity Sexton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Burton and Rebecca Burton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fields et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv00086
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, John Doe Corporations 1-50, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Don Fields and Janice Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00404
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Trish Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
Rapier v. Coloplast Corp. et al
as 3:2020cv00405
Plaintiff:
Helen Rapier
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Coloplast Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ottersbach v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00380
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ottersbach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potter v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Robert Potter
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00295
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00157
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Arthur Mitchell and Nora Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
