Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Alexander v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv20754
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Alexander
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19340
Plaintiff:
Janice Alexander and Charles Alexander
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv17741
Plaintiff:
Angel Claire Alexander
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16558
Plaintiff:
Lucille Rose Alexander
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16401
Plaintiff:
Denise Alexander
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Qualls et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11949
Plaintiff:
Jessika D. Qualls and Alexander Esmond Qualls
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09643
Plaintiff:
Demetria Alexander
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv09144
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Alexander and Timothy L. Alexander
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08577
Plaintiff:
Rebecca F. Alexander
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07942
Plaintiff:
Sharon K. Alexander
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
