Cases 41 - 50 of 417
Bridges et al v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP et al
as 3:2013cv00477
Defendant:
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP As successor in Interest to Phillips Chemical Company formerly known as ConocoPhillips also known as Phillips 66 Company doing business as Drilling Specialties Company, Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Bridges, John Courtney, Jerry Freeman, Sr. and others
Not Classified By Court:
David C. Gibbons and David Y. Lamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv03417
Defendant:
El Paso CGP Company doing business as Coastal Oil New York, Inc. formerly known as Coastal Corporation, TRMI Holdings Inc., Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Water Finance Agency, The Water Board and The City of New York
Petitioner:
Gary Stumpf, Thomas M Milton, Meena Nainan and others
Material Witne:
Barker Hamill
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Devera v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 9:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Devera
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devera v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Devera
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander et al v.Honeywell International et al
as 2:2017cv12062
Defendant:
Spirax Sarco, Inc., Valero Energy Corporation, Plastics Engineering Company and others
Plaintiff:
William W. Alexander and William K. Alexander
Not Classified By Court:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gee, Fred et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00836
Plaintiff:
Fred Gee and Lorraine Gee
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Sunoco, Inc. (R & M), Texaco Downstream Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sexton v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00482
Defendant:
Brock Industrial Services, LLC, Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Orange County Water District v. Unocal Corp.
as 15-3934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Orange County Water District
Defendant / Appellee:
Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc., NKA TMR Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, Shell Oil Company, DBA Shell Oil Products US and others
Defendant:
Unocal Corporation, ConocoPhillips Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., DBA Chevron Products Campany, DBA Chevron Chemical Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Tesoro Petroleum Corporation.
Morgan v. DOW Chemical Company, et al
as 3:2017cv00269
Defendant:
Aecom Energy and Construction, Inc., Aerojet - General Corporation, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Aerojet - General Corporation, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Anco Insulations, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Boland Marine & Manufacturing Company, Claims Resolution Management Corporation, Gulf Engineering Company, LLC and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Albert Bossier, Entergy Louisiana, LLC, J. Melton Garrett and others
Cross Claimant:
Albert Bossier, Ray Brooks, Rawlin Delaughter and others
Unknown:
Benjamin M. Castoriano, Benjamin M. Castoriano, Benjamin M. Castoriano and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis D Morgan
Counter Claimant:
Travelers Casualty & Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Hayden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2015cv06368
Defendant:
National Automotive Parts Association, Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Cleaver Brooks Inc and others
Cross Defendant:
Anco Insulations Inc, IMO Industries Inc, Ingersoll Rand Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Wyeth Holdings Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline S. Hayden and Thomas H. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
