Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Homles v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv03589
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Holmes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02968
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Holmes and Kenneth C. Holmes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02162
Plaintiff:
Anna Marie Holmes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01731
Plaintiff:
Tina Holmes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes et al v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01503
Plaintiff:
Helen Holmes and David Holmes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33314
Plaintiff:
Willien Holmes
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32525
Plaintiff:
Shirley Holmes and Jack Holmes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holm Menton et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv30698
Plaintiff:
Emmajane Holm Menton and Richard A. Menton, III
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30049
Plaintiff:
Marla Holmes
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv28546
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Holmes and Robert Holmes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
