Cases 41 - 50 of 169
JAMES v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2020cv00236
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA JAMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CABRERA et al v. BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv03833
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA NEWSOM, BRAD JOSEPH HALLIDAY, ANGELA FRITZGES and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, LOUIS BERGER INTERNATIONAL, INC., LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. / BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORPORATION JOINT VENTURE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
CABRERA et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv03835
Plaintiff:
PETER ADAMS, BRAD JOSEPH HALLIDAY, ANGELA FRITZGES and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
JAMES v. CROTHALL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv03241
Defendant:
CROTHALL HEALTHCARE, INC. and CROTHALL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03201
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES v. PITTS
as 1:2019cv02843
Not Yet Classified:
WENDY JAMES
Defendant:
ANDREW PITTS and ANDREW COLLIER PITTS
Plaintiff:
WENDY ERICA JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KLAYMAN v. FITTON et al
as 1:2019cv02793
Defendant:
JAMES PETERSON, CHRISTOPHER FARRELL, PAUL ORFANEDES and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLIVER v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2019cv02485
Plaintiff:
JAMEE OLIVER and J.O.
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and PATRICE BOYD
ROTH et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv02179
Plaintiff:
Amy Payne, Robert S. Bruce, CASSANDRA ISABELLA and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
