Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Brian Lewis v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 13-30718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Galper v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 1:2013cv03449
Plaintiff:
Yelena Galper
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Brian Lewis v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 13-30571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Kahut v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 6:2012cv01769
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Edina M. Kahut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv05606
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BARRETT BATES , ATLANTIC COUNTY and others
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. , MERSCORP. INC. , ALTERNA MORTGAGE CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
FARAH v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2012cv04024
Plaintiff:
JAMES FARAH
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Goldfarb v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A
as 1:2012cv03178
Plaintiff:
Lauren Goldfarb
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roberts v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2011cv04745
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Monica Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
McGee et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 8:2011cv01099
Plaintiff:
Michael McGee , Rema McGee , Robert J. Ryan and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. , National City Mortgage and Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
