Cases 41 - 50 of 402
Kurtz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv03888
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kurtz, Barbara Kurtz, Susan Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holbrook v. Cabell County Prosecutors Office et al
as 3:2016cv03489
Plaintiff:
Shane Stephen Holbrook
Defendant:
Cabell County Prosecutors Office, Joe Finchman and State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holbrook v. HD Media Company LLC et al
as 3:2016cv03280
Plaintiff:
Shane Stephen Holbrook
Defendant:
HD Media Company LLC, Herald Dispatch, Edward H. Dawson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02613
Plaintiff:
Christine Stanton and Stephen Stanton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02598
Plaintiff:
Martha Sue Clark and James Stephen Clarke
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Defur et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02596
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Defur and Stephen M. Defur
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02026
Plaintiff:
Janice Davis and Wayne Stephen Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filapello et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
Sarah Filapello and Stephen Filapello
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16573
Plaintiff:
Tania Stephens
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16231
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Howard and Stephen Howard
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
