Cases 41 - 50 of 120
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04556
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVE SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00756
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICK SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93546
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70503
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv65528
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEROY SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50795
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv47683
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seay v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00323
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Deborah Seay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAGEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32818
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CLARK SEAY MAGEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv29241
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
