Cases 41 - 50 of 175
Hedgecock et al v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
as 3:2018cv00410
Plaintiff:
Everett Norman Moore and Lawrence Hedgecock
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cox et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2018cv00761
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Unnamed Locomotive Engineer and Union Pacific Corporation
Plaintiff:
VIcky Cox, Michael /Cox, Jr., Michael W. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Lawrence W Jackson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jack R. Frost, Jr. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Frost, Jr.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Brian Brooks
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crossley v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Rodney E Crossley
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2018cv00012
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 3:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
Michael George Hill
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Johnson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2017cv00653
Plaintiff:
Demeia Johnson , Daniel Hudnall , Demonicia Johnson and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Metra White , Tony Handsborough , Katrina Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2017cv03479
Plaintiff:
Rosie Mayes
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
