Cases 51 - 60 of 2,149
Keating et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00453
Plaintiff:
Cheri Keating and William Keating
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrera et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Tracy Ferrera and William Ferrera
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams, Sr. v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC , John Doe Corporations and John Doe Tortfeasors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lomax et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04645
Plaintiff:
Donna J. Lomax and William H. Lomax, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv04644
Plaintiff:
Millicent Williams
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Culp et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv04609
Plaintiff:
Ann Culp and William Culp
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv04400
Plaintiff:
William Anderson, Jr. and Laura Anderson
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendricks v. Cook Medical, LLC, et al
as 5:2017cv04319
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hendricks
Defendant:
Cook Medical, LLC , Cook Incorporated , Cook Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv04306
Plaintiff:
Laurie A. Henderson and William H. Henderson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04231
Plaintiff:
Marsha Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
