Cases 51 - 60 of 227
GALANG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15059
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARIES GALANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rothenberg v. Pluczenik
as 7:2021cv02009
Plaintiff:
Chaya Rothenberg
Defendant:
Arie Pluczenik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Cuevas Vargas v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
ARIS IRAIDA CUEVAS VARGAS
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. and JOSE LOPEZ HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF ARI YOEL FULD et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2020cv03492
Plaintiff:
ELIEZER YAKIR FULD, TAMAR GILA FULD, MIRIAM FULD and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
MILLER et al v. RECH et al
as 2:2021cv00001
Plaintiff:
MIRAYNA MILLER and ARI BEY
Defendant:
CARL P. RECH and SEARGENT DELLALO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
LYNCH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01398
Plaintiff:
ARIES LYNCH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv16838
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARIS LARON BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEINBERG et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN
as 1:2020cv02996
Plaintiff:
DANIEL YAAKOV FULD, ADERET RIVKAH HENKIN, HARVEY JONAS YONAH FULD and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
San Martin et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 6:2020cv01769
Plaintiff:
Wendy Stone, Emilio San Martin, Jeff Kozak and others
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSARIO v. ARY et al
as 2:2020cv13218
Plaintiff:
LUCRECIA M ROSARIO
Defendant:
STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC., DANIEL ARY, JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
