Torts - Injury Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 51 - 60 of 177
Warrington v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv31211
Plaintiff: Carla Warrington
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McFall et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv31303
Plaintiff: Carla Ann McFall and Harry Lee McFall
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gudorf v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv30898
Plaintiff: Carla L. Gudorf
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bledsoe et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30998
Plaintiff: Carla Bledsoe and Mark Bledsoe
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warrington v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30114
Plaintiff: Carla Warrington
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcinko v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv30087
Plaintiff: Carla Sue Marcinko
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dudek et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv30106
Plaintiff: Carla Dudek and Nicholas Ronald Dudek
Defendant: Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whaley et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29724
Plaintiff: Carla Whaley , Marie Westhoff , Anita Davidson and others
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dolak-Gallagher v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv29542
Plaintiff: Carla Jean Dolak-Gallagher
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopp v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28875
Plaintiff: Carla Hopp
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?