Cases 51 - 60 of 297
In re: Fosamax
as 14-2585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMY ALSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMAN LA ROCHE INC and others
In Re: Fosamax, et al
as 14-2566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDITH BROADSTONE
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, GENENTECH INC and others
Rachel Pesota v. Roche Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03892
Defendant:
Coast Dermatology & Laser Surgery Center, Doe California Parmaceutical Companies, Doe Pharmacies and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Pesota
In Re: Fosamax
as 14-2347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY JO ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMAN LA ROCHE INC and others
In Re: Fosamax, et al
as 14-2447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA DISOSWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, GENENTECH INC and others
In Re: Fosamax
as 14-2483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTHA HASLAM and WILLIAM L. HASLAM
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE, a Delaware limited liability company, ROCHE LABORATORIES INC, a Delaware corporation and others
In re: Fosamax
as 14-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA L. KNIFFEN and DONALD L. KNIFFEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE, GENETECH INC, RP and others
In Re: Fosamax
as 14-2311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERRY M. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP, HOFFMANN LA ROCHE, ROCHE LABORATORIES INC and others
WHITE et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as 3:2014cv02717
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA WHITE and JIM WHITE
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOSES et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al
as 3:2014cv00731
Plaintiff:
ELAINE DOSES and HAROLD DOSES
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
