Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Banks v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06193
Plaintiff:
Roberta L. Banks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Banks et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06018
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Ann Banks and Chester Homer Banks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Banks v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05711
Plaintiff:
Melissa Banks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Banks v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv03441
Plaintiff:
Orelia Banks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02400
Plaintiff:
Estelle Banks
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02226
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Banks and Michael Banks
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01318
Plaintiff:
Marie Banks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Suntrust Bank et al
as 1:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Lacy Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Suntrust Bank , Teresa Pike and Christina Lee Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 3:2010cv00449
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bailey
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
