Cases 61 - 70 of 340
Ennals v. ADESA Virginia, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00580
Plaintiff:
Mark Ennals
Defendant:
ADESA, Inc., John Doe, John Doe Entity and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gales v. United Airlines et al
as 1:2021cv00517
Defendant:
Jane Doe, ManaAir LLC, United Airlines, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Gales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sirleaf v. Doe et al
as 7:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf and Monolu Sacker Sirleaf
Defendant:
Emma S. Urey, Jimmy Doe and Counselor Matiangai Arnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brice, II v. Cherry et al
as 2:2021cv00211
Defendant:
Dexter Earl Cherry, XPO Logistics Drayage, LLC and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Dennis Maurice Brice, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper v. HashtagDMV, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00447
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cooper
Defendant:
HashtagDMV, LLC, John Doe (Bouncer #1) and John Doe (Bouncer #2)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J.D.G.J. v. Doe et al
as 5:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
J.D.G.J.
Respondent:
Trexis Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
John Doe and VSS Transportation Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kropf v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00798
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Plaintiff:
Diane Kropf and Joseph Kropf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 6:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Kyleigh Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00057
Defendant:
John Doe, Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Endeavor Air, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diane C. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hazley v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01039
Plaintiff:
Laverne Hazley
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Does 1 through 100 inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
