Cases 61 - 70 of 125
Heatherly v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02807
Plaintiff:
Linda Heatherly
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guidry v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02816
Plaintiff:
Karla A. Guidry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmonds et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv02750
Plaintiff:
Mikkii Edmonds and Cody Lee Emonds
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aguilar et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02742
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Aguilar and Hilario Aguilar
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02741
Plaintiff:
Sara Bell and Terrance Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv02740
Plaintiff:
Donna Barrett
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02643
Plaintiff:
Maxine Matthews Clark
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thorpe v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02546
Plaintiff:
Carla J. Thorpe
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slone et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02544
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Slone and David K. Slone
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02426
Plaintiff:
Floann P. Gray
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
