Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Lane v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv30001
Plaintiff:
Rickie R. Lane
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv29157
Plaintiff:
Dona M. Lane
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv29009
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Dianne Beach Lane
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv28837
Plaintiff:
Sara Renee Phillips and Tom Lane Phillips
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26976
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Lane and Stephen A. Lane
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erskine et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv25972
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ruth Erskine and Lane Allen Erskine
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv22706
Plaintiff:
Kanilla Lane
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21752
Plaintiff:
Wanda Lane
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv19654
Plaintiff:
Rebecca C. Lane
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv20009
Plaintiff:
Tonya Lane
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
