Cases 71 - 80 of 107
LEWIS, JR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50640
Plaintiff:
MARCUS LEWIS, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42181
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON LEWIS, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36138
Plaintiff:
WILLIE LEWIS, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01237
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEWIS, JR.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan v. MCI Mace et al
as 2:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
T. Terrell Bryan
Defendant:
MCI Mace, SCDC , U.S. Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00818
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lewis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS et al v. AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80846
Plaintiff:
IRENE LEWIS , HAROLD LEWIS , MARY HOWARD and others
Defendant:
AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD, COLONIAL SUGAR REFINING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51739
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. LEWIS, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LEWIS v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79715
Plaintiff:
FRANK CHARLES LEWIS, JR.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broussard et al v Gulfstream Coach Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02510
Plaintiff:
Gloria Broussard , Gloria Davis , Markela McCain and others
Defendant:
Gulfstream Coach, Inc. and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
