Cases 71 - 80 of 1,219
Marko et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07060
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Marko and Richard Marko
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv06640
Plaintiff:
Donna Johnson and Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv06594
Plaintiff:
Theresa Richards and Joseph Richards
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06544
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M. Bartley and Richard P. Bartley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowden et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06438
Plaintiff:
Jenny Bowden and Richard Leon Bowden
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06347
Plaintiff:
Ernestine T. Garcia and Richard L. Garcia
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giles et v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06348
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Sandra C. Giles and Richard E. Giles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coiner et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06197
Plaintiff:
Gail Coiner and Richard Coiner, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurtz et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06149
Plaintiff:
Vicki Kurtz and Richard Kurtz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eglinton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05913
Plaintiff:
Judy Eglinton and Richard Eglinton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
