Cases 81 - 90 of 147
Bell v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32453
Plaintiff:
Maria Y. Bell
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31593
Plaintiff:
Linda Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30239
Plaintiff:
Sara Belle Morgan and Samuel J. Morgan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30166
Plaintiff:
Sheila Kay Bell and Eddie Stacy Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belling et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv28056
Plaintiff:
Sharon Louise Belling and John C. Belling
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alamprese v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27905
Plaintiff:
Helen Belle Alamprese
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fitzgerald et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv26013
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Marie Fitzgerald , Grace M. Flora-Stinnett , Carol Jane Dobrowolski and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv25514
Plaintiff:
Maxine Bell
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodges et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv25230
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Belle Hodges and Steve Hodges
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv25169
Plaintiff:
Judy C. Bell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
