Cases 81 - 90 of 383
POTTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00791
Defendant:
MENCHHOFER TREE CARE LLC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
REBECCA POTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Middleton v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Ronald Middleton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Beville et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Margaret Beville and Seth Beville
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MARCUM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00428
Defendant:
SUNIL THOLPADY, JEFFERY BENNETT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MARCUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Tenar v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00122
Defendant:
Elijah Carter and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Virginia Tener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PADGETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PADGETT
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS, DNP, APRN-BC, ANONYMOUS INTERN, ANONYMOUS, MSW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00179
Plaintiff:
SARAH DAY and SARAH E. DAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Johnson et al v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Greenleaf and Jacqueline Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
TORBET v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY et al
as 4:2021cv00003
Defendant:
SHANNA N. REILEY, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JILL K. TORBET
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
REED et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
Brandy Reed and Michael Reed
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
