Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Farmer v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, et al.
as 5:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
TERESA FARMER
Defendant:
BECKTON, DICKINSON, AND COMPANY, C.R. BARD, INC., BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Farmer et al v. Hankook Tire Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2018cv00011
Defendant:
Hankook Tire Co., Ltd. , John B. Ostwalt, Jr. and Hankook Tire America Corporation
Plaintiff:
Stacey Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH, ET AL. V. 3M COMPANY, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv00379
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, FARMERS CHEMICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., THE RUST ENGINEERING COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
SMITH, JULIAN JACKSON SMITH and DOROTHY E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Farmer v. Eagle Systems and Services, Incorporated et al
as 5:2014cv00403
Defendant:
Eagle Systems and Services, Incorporated and Data Solutions & Technology (DST), Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharel Farmer
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Farmer v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2011cv00507
Plaintiff:
Shardae S. Farmer
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
ALLEN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00863
Plaintiff:
GARY ALLEN , DENISE BENNETT and LINDA FARMER
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farmer et al v. Enprotech Mechanical Services, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00468
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Renee Farmer and Michael R Farmer
Defendant:
Enprotech Mechanical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Farmer, Sr. et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00024
Plaintiff:
Carol Dean Farmer, Sr. and Mary A. Farmer
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg Warner Corporation, CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
A. W. Chesterton Company
Cross Defendant:
Fluor Daniel Services Corporation, General Refractories Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
