Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Walters v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo L. Walters
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Fong et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2018cv00481
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon SARL and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Fong and Lorenzo Fong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitley-Brooks et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01415
Plaintiff:
Latonya Whitley-Brooks and Lorenzo Brooks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valerio et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv08485
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Valerio and Lorenzo Valerio
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv05646
Plaintiff:
Destani Harris and Lorenzo Harris
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nunez et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv05563
Plaintiff:
Velma Vaesa Nunez and Lorenzo Nunez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medina et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08784
Plaintiff:
Magda Medina and Lorenzo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23512
Plaintiff:
Dorothy L. Jackson and Lorenzo L. Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lorenzo v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20747
Plaintiff:
Delana Lorenzo
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18925
Plaintiff:
Debra Diane Smith and Lorenzo Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
