Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00521
Defendant:
Laureate Institute, Tulsa County, Ryan Braschler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brister et al v. Bossen et al
as 6:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Vanessa Pierce Plunkett, RGB Eye Associates, PA, P&B Eye Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James L. Brister and Kathy L. Brister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cruz et al v. Johnson Matthey Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Cruz , Scott Bender , Konark Ogra and others
Defendant:
Johnson Matthey Inc. , University of Tulsa, The , Chevron Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hughes et al v. Pierce et al
as 4:2014cv00224
Plaintiff:
Stanford Gene Hughes and Cheryl Hughes
Defendant:
Robert Eugene Pierce, Federal Express Corp. , Protective Insurance Co. and others
Intervenor:
CompSource Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. ConAgra Foods Inc
as 5:2007cv00993
Plaintiff:
Thomas S Pierce and Thomas S Pierce
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods Inc, ConAgra Foods Inc and ConAgra Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Pierce et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 6:2007cv00202
Plaintiff:
Melinda Pierce and Jim Pierce
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
