Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Saulsberry v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02239
Plaintiff:
Lillian Saulsberry
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Curtis Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chomsky et al v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
Don Chomsky and Amy Chomsky
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kail v. Lowe et al
as 2:2019cv02820
Defendant:
James A. Lowe and Aramark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dylan S. Kail
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Aramark Campus, LLC
as 2:2019cv02064
Plaintiff:
Kameron Walker
Defendant:
Aramark Campus, LLC
Undetermined:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Paul Robinson
Defendant:
Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Littlejohn v. Kimco Facility Services, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
Arnita Littlejohn
Defendant:
Kimco Facility Services, LLC, Prefco XIV, Aramark Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beene v. Aramark Educational Services, LLC
as 3:2014cv01850
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Beene
Defendant:
Aramark Educational Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mullins v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00261
Plaintiff:
Ashley Blake Mullins
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. and Lloyd Vernon Ball
Counter_claimant:
Lloyd Vernon Ball and Aramark Services, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Ashley Blake Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Drummond v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
Linda Drummond
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
