Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ramsbottom et al v. Ashton et al
as 3:2021cv00272
Defendant:
C3 Presents, L.L.C., Lorin Ashton, Amorphous Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Ramsbottom, Alexis Bowling, Jenna Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595
Riggs v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
Timothy Riggs
Defendant:
Cate Kilgore and Bowling Green, Kentucky, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Calvin v. Winchester Bowl, LLC
as 2:2019cv02383
Defendant:
Winchester Bowl, LLC
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Calvin
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boulton v. Winchester Bowl, LLC d/b/a Winchester Bowl
as 2:2019cv02170
Plaintiff:
Walter Boulton
Undetermined:
Temiika Gipson
Defendant:
Winchester Bowl, LLC d/b/a Winchester Bowl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowles v. United States of America (TV3)
as 2:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Naomi W. Bowles
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bowling v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Bessie Bowling
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryder et al v. Bowling
as 2:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Mary Margaret Ryder , Chad James Tacy and James Cody Ryder
Defendant:
Kevin James Bowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowling and Pam Bowling
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Estate of James B. Tacy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2013cv00514
Plaintiff:
Angelia R. Bowling
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Bowles v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2007cv01022
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bowles and Barbara Bowles
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
