Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Caudill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01792
Plaintiff:
Dianne Caudill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09086
Plaintiff:
Christie Caudill and Henry Caudill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv09261
Plaintiff:
Victoria Caudill and Robert Adam Caudill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv26569
Plaintiff:
Darlene Caudill
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv18256
Plaintiff:
Sandra Caudill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Robin Rae Caudill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv28986
Plaintiff:
Loretta Gibson , Diana Keena , Helen Adams and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv23942
Plaintiff:
Connie Caudill and Christopher Caudill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07879
Plaintiff:
Sharon Caudill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Caudill et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00552
Plaintiff:
Darlene K. Caudill and Timothy Caudill
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
