Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Bailor v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Defendant:
Revlon Inc. and Revlon Consumer Products Corporation
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Bailor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barrett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2021cv00175
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Barrett, Ashley Boulafentis, Zack Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winget v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00613
Plaintiff:
Caroline Winget
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03344
Plaintiff:
Treva McCarthy , Toni Adkison , Martha Anderson and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Endo Health Solutions Inc. , Astora Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott-Wilson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv01373
Plaintiff:
Caroline M. Scott-Wilson and Clisby Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01301
Plaintiff:
Caroline Pinion Akins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owens-Tucker v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01084
Plaintiff:
Caroline Owens-Tucker
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Caroline Rollins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramkissoon v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11483
Plaintiff:
Caroline Ramkissoon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hobbs v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11327
Plaintiff:
Caroline Hobbs
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
