Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Inscoe et al v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Hatfield and Herbert Eugene Inscoe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv01178
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Richard
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08859
Plaintiff:
Ollie Wynette Coleman and Charles W. Coleman, Sr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avis et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv07820
Plaintiff:
Judith A. Avis and Charles W. Avis
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Gynecare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kalichun et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv06582
Plaintiff:
Clara Janet Kalichun and Charles W. Kalichun
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv01911
Plaintiff:
Sandra H. Rogers and Charles W. Rogers
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyle et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29970
Plaintiff:
Andrea Boyle and Charles W. Boyle, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Runge et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv28200
Plaintiff:
Mary Runge and Charles W. Runge
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newhouse v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv25666
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Newhouse
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schoenborn et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv15911
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Ruth Schoenborn and Charles W. Schoenborn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
