Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rupp v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03159
Plaintiff:
Darby Ann Rupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darby v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02766
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Darby
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darby v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02827
Plaintiff:
Donna Darby
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darby v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15727
Plaintiff:
Rachael Darby
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv16958
Plaintiff:
Connie Anderson and Darby Anderson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhodes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06031
Plaintiff:
Darby C. Rhodes and G. Roger Rhodes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Darby v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05344
Plaintiff:
Lila Darby
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frampton v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03897
Plaintiff:
Darby Frampton
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walters et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02698
Plaintiff:
Darby Walters and Jason Walters
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Darby et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Sandra Darby and James Darby, Sr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
