Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Heard et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Tasca Heard and Dwight Heard
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sexton et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv05135
Plaintiff:
Kelly D. Sexton and Dwight D. Sexton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv04144
Plaintiff:
Annie Hill and Dwight Hill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Auten et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01706
Plaintiff:
Patricia Auten and Dwight Auten
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashworth et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08742
Plaintiff:
Mary Ashworth and Dwight Ashworth
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boutwell et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07898
Plaintiff:
Lisa K. Boutwell and Dwight W. Boutwell
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Jane Doe Corporations 21-40 and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03568
Plaintiff:
Margaret Adams and Dwight Adams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hager et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03183
Plaintiff:
Eileen Hager and Dwight Rardon
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metz v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dwight Bruce Metz
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haskins v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv31162
Plaintiff:
Dwight Haskins
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
