Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gillis
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant:
Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party:
Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mark Chamberlain et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10964
Defendant:
Viking Pump, Inc., Asco Valve, SB Decking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Chamberlain and Judith Chamberlain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cupp v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10168
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, BW/IP, Inc., Warren Pumps LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
Ericsson, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gail Cupp, James Cupp, Jason Cupp and others
Not Classified By Court:
Robert B. Collings, Edward F. Harrington and Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Daigle et al v. Foster Wheeler Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv12138
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Daigle and William L. Daigle
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Corporation, Borg-Warner Corporation, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Shelby et al v. A.W. Chesterton et al
as 1:2009cv10594
Plaintiff:
Lynn Montero
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Asco Valves, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
