Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Greenwood et al v. Cando Rail & Terminals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01024
Defendant:
Cando Rail & Terminals, Inc., Cando Rail Services, LTD and Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marci Greenwood and Kourtney Greenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Medlin et al v. Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01010
Plaintiff:
Donald H. Medlin, III and Krissten Medlin
Defendant:
John Does, 1-5 and Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01009
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC and John Does, 1-5
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. DOW Chemical Company, et al
as 3:2017cv00269
Defendant:
Aecom Energy and Construction, Inc., Aerojet - General Corporation, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Aerojet - General Corporation, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Anco Insulations, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Boland Marine & Manufacturing Company, Claims Resolution Management Corporation, Gulf Engineering Company, LLC and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Albert Bossier, Entergy Louisiana, LLC, J. Melton Garrett and others
Cross Claimant:
Albert Bossier, Ray Brooks, Rawlin Delaughter and others
Unknown:
Benjamin M. Castoriano, Benjamin M. Castoriano, Benjamin M. Castoriano and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis D Morgan
Counter Claimant:
Travelers Casualty & Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Hunter v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 2:2008cv03893
Plaintiff:
Ken Hunter, Ken Hunter, Ken Hunter and others
Defendant:
LA Ash, Inc., Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
