Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Eagon et al v. Cabell County Emergency Medical Services et al
as 3:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Rex Eagon, Diana Eagon and Estate of Darien M. Eagon
Defendant:
Cabell County Emergency Medical Services, Unidentified Cabell County Emergency Medical Services Agent, Gordon Merry III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2016cv12410
Plaintiff:
Roy J. Smith and Christine Sue Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12393
Plaintiff:
Jennifer J. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv09455
Plaintiff:
Helen J. Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07289
Plaintiff:
Emma J. Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05964
Plaintiff:
Teresa J. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05166
Plaintiff:
Izetta J. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02406
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Smith and William J. Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
Mary H. Smith and Arlo J. Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv12421
Plaintiff:
Roberta J. Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
