Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Edwards v. Wurth Wood Group
as 3:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Wurth Wood Group
Plaintiff:
James Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gossens et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01168
Plaintiff:
Vickie Gossens and James Edward Gossens
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooldridge et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv09289
Plaintiff:
Dewanda Wooldridge and James Edward Wooldridge
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitlatch v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01239
Plaintiff:
James Edward Whitlatch
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dillard-Murray et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv24427
Plaintiff:
Monique Dillard-Murray and James Edward Murray
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paugh et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16016
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Paugh and James Edward Paugh
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forrest et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14103
Plaintiff:
Dionna Forrest and James Edward Forrest
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanderson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12372
Plaintiff:
Karen Sanderson and James Edward Sanderson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paris et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11691
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Paris and James Edwards Paris, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv09398
Plaintiff:
Rosie Quintana Hudson and James Edward Hudson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
