Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jackson v. Mallott et al
as 2:2017cv01521
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Defendant:
Orville B. Mallott and Washington State Patrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett et al v United States of America
as 3:2017cv05774
Plaintiff:
Autumn Bennett , Shannan Hicks , Gentia Jackson and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Levin et al v. Pacific Hide & Fur Depot
as 2:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
David M Levin and Teresa J Levin
Defendant:
Pacific Hide & Fur Depot , Kyle Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Talley v Jackson et al
as 2:2015cv00855
Plaintiff:
Jerome Talley
Defendant:
Donna Jackson and James P. Donohue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
Deirdre Jackson
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dynes v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01581
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dynes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Cook Medical Incorporated, Scott Phillip Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beatrice Velasco et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01208
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Velasco , Georgia Lou Payne , Rodney Penland and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , AstraZeneca PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holcombe Elmer v. Jackson et al
as 3:2009cv05671
Plaintiff:
Karen Holcombe Elmer
Defendant:
James C Jackson and Wavemaker Boat & Auto Transit LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Khastkhodaei et al v. Jackson et al
as 2:2009cv00914
Plaintiff:
Rasool Khastkhodaei, Fariba Beglari and Rasool Khastkhodaei
Defendant:
Sarah Jackson, Ed Dillon, Diane Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
