Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Osazemwogie v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Efe Osazemwogie
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Cal Ark International, Inc., Everest Denali Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Hai'le v. The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe, & Jack, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04578
Plaintiff:
Hai'le I. Nas'eer and Nas'eer I. Hai'le
Defendant:
Icahn Automotive Group, LLC doing business as The Pep Boys - Manny Moe & Jack, Icahn Enterprises L.P., John Doe 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Harrison v. Houchens Food Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Sharon Harrison
Defendant:
Houchens Food Group, Inc. and John Does 2-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burgos-Hernandez, et al. v. Metro Santurce, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
ISUE BURGOS HERNANDEZ, GUARIONEX ALVARADO ADORNO, in representation of their minor sons YEAB, YAAB and YOAB, Isue Burgos-Hernandez and Guarionex Alvarado-Adorno
Defendant:
Metro Santurce, Inc., Maria Casado and her husband JOHN DOE, each of them personally and in representation of their conjugal partnership, EDNA FIGUEROA and her husband John Doe 1, each of them personally and in representation of their conjugal partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Cohen v. Edison Management Co. L.L.C. et al
as 1:2010cv06519
Plaintiff:
Salomon Alon Cohen
Defendant:
Edison Management Co. L.L.C., Hotel Edison, Edison Hotel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boykin v. Tenet South Fulton, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03016
Plaintiff:
Annie Carter Boykin and Annie Carter Boykin
Defendant:
Tenet South Fulton, Inc., Tenet South Fulton, Inc., South Fulton Medical Center, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
