Cases 1 - 10 of 71
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L. MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RITZ v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22865
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L RITZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Watley v. Reale et al
as 2:2023cv10978
Plaintiff:
William Rayeh Watley
Defendant:
Tammy J. Reale, Gretchen Whitmer, Jacquelyn A. Mcclinton and others
Claimant:
William-ray Watley, William Daniel Watley, Darius Rayel Watley and others
Bryant v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01227
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Bryant
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WYATT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv03748
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L WYATT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Young v. MP Delivery Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Justin L Young
Defendant:
MP Delivery Inc and Mirko Peric
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
STUBBLEFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25059
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L STUBBLEFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12680
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEVI JONES and JUSTIN L JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MITCHUSSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01345
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L. MITCHUSSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DUSHEKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46155
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L DUSHEKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
