Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Martinez et al v. Viad Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv00619
Defendant:
Viad Corp. , Alfa Laval, Inc. , Allis-Chalmers Pump, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Buda Company and others
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Martinez and Sandra Martinez
Cross_claimant:
Crane Company, individually and on behalf of Deming Company
Cross_defendant:
Crane Company, individually and on behalf of Deming Company , Alfa Laval, Inc. , Allis-Chalmers Pump, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Buda Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02699
Plaintiff:
Leonard Brooks and Leonard Brooks
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Goldenstein et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02567
Plaintiff:
Elaine B. Goldenstein and Leonard R. Goldenstein
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ralston et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02559
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ralston, Angelita Ralston, Emerson Ralston and others
Defendant:
DAVOL INC., C.R. Bard, Inc., Nagui Sorour and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Davis v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02076
Plaintiff:
Leonard Clay Davis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leonard v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv02047
Plaintiff:
Linda Y. Leonard
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norris v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv02059
Plaintiff:
William Leonard Norris
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2007md01842
Plaintiff:
Deborah June Bilbrey, Wendy H. Risley, Lois Askins and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc, WCO Medical Products Corporation, Baolien Nguyen Tu and others
Interested Party:
Ernest Cory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
